HILLARY PANICKING After Cop Investigating DNC Staffer’s Murder Just EXPOSED THE SHOCKING EVIDENCE He WITNESSED

VIA| FOR DECADES MILLIONS OF AMERICANS HAVE SEEN THE EVIDENCE OF THE CLINTON’S HYPOCRISY.

Their false appearance of virtue and concealment of their real character, especially morality, has again been confirmed.


Earlier this week, scandalous news was revealed showing their evil intentions towards everyone but themselves. Remember last year’s unusual murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich?

Well, more details of the truth have now come forward. President Trump may not even have to lift a finger to defeat Mrs. Clinton after all.

VIA| freedomdaily,

We’ve all seen the massive trail of dead bodies that follow the Clintons around wherever they go. Cross one of the crooked pair, and you’re likely to get “suicided” with a double tap to the back of the head. As Hillary and Bill continue to get away with their dirty deeds, unfortunately for them, a homicide detective who was assigned to investigate the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich just came forward with very disturbing new details that’s no doubt making crooked Hillary squirm just a little more than usual today.

If you’re not familiar with the story by now, DNC staffer Seth Rich was savagely murdered last July, right after feeding Wikileaks with some very disturbing dirt on Hillary prior to the presidential election. Several weeks later, Wikileaks would release thousands of emails related to Hillary as part of the infamous DNC Leaks, but Rich at that point was already dead. After leaving his Northwest D.C. neighborhood early Sunday morning on July 10, Rich was brutally shot multiple times before the shooter fled the scene, leaving zero evidence for authorities to solve the murder. It was an obvious intentional hit on his life and not a random robbing, as none of his personal items has been taken.

Following the grizzly murder, very little leads have been made by detectives assigned to the case, and now we just learned the  disturbing reason why. In a breaking report that’s just starting to make its rounds, Rod Wheeler, the lead detective who was hired by Seth Rich’s family to investigate the murder, told FOX 5 in DC that local police have been continuously stone-walling the investigation, while telling him to “stand down” on the Seth Rich murder investigation. Here’s a portion of his bombshell interview:

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’