US Christian Soldiers Forced To Bow Down To Islam? … Look What Army Says
K BAISH| The Jewish and Christian faiths have been scrutinized for thousands of years. In fact, the reason that so many immigrants came to America in the first place was to live freely with their own religious beliefs. America was founded as a Christian country, and for Christians to be told that they must accept a different religion is simply wrong. No one should be expected to be okay with being forced spiritual guidance from another religion. We especially see issues arise when we are being told how to practice religion by those whose very religion says it’s okay to kill those who don’t have the same religious beliefs as they do.
So, what makes it okay that the US military is being told what god to pray to by a Muslim chaplain? These American soldiers (the majority of which are Christians) should NOT be getting spiritual guidance from a Muslim, plain and simple. Watching this happen to the United States military is truly sickening. When will Liberals stop shoving their views down everyone else’s throats?
The Conservative Tribune reported:
In the latest example of questionable liberal policies that are aimed more at looking good than at getting good results, a Muslim chaplain has been put in charge of spiritual guidance for roughly 14,000 American soldiers, most of whom are Christian, McClatchy reported.
Lt. Col. Khallid Shabazz has been appointed chaplain to the Army’s 7th Infantry Division, stationed near Tacoma, Washington, and will now be overseeing the spiritual affairs of Christian soldiers. Does anyone else see a potential problem with this? Since when was it proper to have a Muslim provide religious guidance to a Christian?
“For me, a regular old guy from Louisiana, I look to the heavens and say, ‘Why me?’” Shabazz recounted. “As the day gets closer, I’m sure I’ll have more anxiety and think about it more. I’m extremely proud to have been on this journey for 20 years and never would’ve imagined that I’d be chosen to be the first (division-level Muslim chaplain).
And WND also reported:
According to the Department of Defense, there are only roughly 6,000 Muslims serving in the United States military. The Army has five Muslim chaplains, and the military in its entirety only 10.
This has to be some sort of sick joke. There is no good reason for a Muslim chaplain to be “ministering” Christian soldiers. Americans are sick and tired of this cultural appropriation crap, and our military isn’t the place for the Left to test our patients.
It is a known fact that former President Barack Obama PURPOSELY replaced senior Christian military officers with Muslims, Atheists, and other people who have no goals to support the Christian faith of so many of our soldiers. It actually seems that the people Obama replaced Christian senior military officers with would actually rather destroy the Christian faith than help nurture it. Luckily, President Trump is a good Christian, and we can count our lucky stars that he will be working on eliminating these issues immediately.
HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP
“Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance.
Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.”
Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump.
Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon.
“Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.”
Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday.
The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.”
But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why?
At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime.
“The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained:
For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code.
However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct.
A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.”
However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him.
. Obama’s Iran nuke deal
Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server
Obama IRS targets conservatives
Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters
Obamacare & Obama’s false promises
Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order
Operation Fast & Furious
5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl
‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session
Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval
Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law
Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act
Illegally conducting war against Libya
NSA: Spying on Americans
Muslim Brotherhood ties
Solyndra and the lost $535 million
Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress
Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers
Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’