ROMNEY WORDSWORTH – That assertion is a smear by the LeftMedia, in coordination with the DemocRat Party,  that has been released across the Dinosaur Media since Donald Trump’s election.  The reason is two-fold:  1) To attack and discredit Steve Bannon, Trump’s Chief Strategic Advisor, who is from Alt Right Media outlet Breitbart News.  2) To attack nationalism and Trump’s populist movement as racist (nothing new here).



For the Marxist Left, everything is always framed in terms of race, because the Left wants to foment a Race War in America.  By keeping America divided along racial lines, the Left hopes to Divide & Conquer America.

So if the Alt Right isn’t a White Nationalist movement, then what is it?  The Alternative Right rose up as a rejection to Bushism, and the kind of faux conservatism practiced by Mitch McConnell in the Senate and by John Boehner as Speaker of the House, and now Paul Ryan doing the same thing.  These were the RINO (Republican In Name Only) leaders who told Republican voters that, in order to survive electorally, the GOP had to get behind Amnesty for illegals.  Remember that this was the conventional wisdom out of Washington before Donald Trump came along.  Amnesty was the signature issue of Jeb Bush who, in 2015, declared that he would win the Republican Primary without the kind of conservatives who wanted our borders enforced.  Traditional conservatism that wanted to put American interests, citizens, and industry first were derided and unwelcome in the Republican Party.


The Alt Right stood against all the “transformative changes” that Barack Obama was wreaking on the country, with the collusion of the RINO leadership in Congress.  From this the grass roots TEA Party was formed, the original nucleus of the Alt Right.  DemocRats immediately tried to paint the TEA Party as white and racist as well.  ANY opposition to the Marxist Left is ALWAYS attacked as “racist”.  Calling the Alt Right a white nationalist movement is just the latest way to call conservatives racist.

bbAt the same time, the Left is attacking Alt Right Media platforms as “fake news”.  As usual, the Left accuses us of what they themselves do.  It is the LeftMedia that is the real Fake News:  Fake polls, dishonest reporting, and the suppression of any truth that is damaging to the DemocRats and their Marxist Agenda.  The Alt Right Media is really the New Media, or the Truth Telling Media.  The media that will cover and report on the Wikileaks emails that showed what a corrupt and evil witch Hillary Clinton is, and how the Left Fake News was giving Clinton the debate questions ahead of time.

The logical conclusion of playing the Race Card is for the DemocRats to conflate love of country with racism, and patriotism, populism, and nationalism as “whiteness”.  As a loose coalition of minority blocs, and a party that deals exclusively in Racial Identity Politics, the DemocRats have to create a racial divide where the real divide is Nationalism versus Globalism.  They have to create the propaganda that will keep the denizens of their political plantation from feeling welcome in their adversaries’ camp. 

As Steve Bannon has pointed out, if Donald Trump delivers on his promise of jobs and prosperity, then in the 2020 election 60% of whites will vote for Trump, and 40% of Blacks and 30% of Hispanics.  The DemocRat racial coalition will be shattered and the Republicans will rule the country for the next 50 years under the governing principles of a populist nationalism.

This nationalism is simply a reaffirmation of the principles laid down in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.  It is a recommitment to put the American Republic first, respect private property rights, and guarantee personal liberty.  Globalism, pushed by the Left, is a rejection of all this, a rejection of the Enlightenment, and even the Magna Carta itself.  It is mere Feudalism warmed over, this time ruled by Global Bankers with diplomatic immunity and using fiat paper currency to own all of the world’s assets and keep everyone as poor serfs through carbon taxes.

The Left is obsessed with controlling every facet of our lives, in every way.  Good men and women do not seek such power.  They resist it.

God Bless America, and keep Donald Trump safe.

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’