WATCH: BLACK PANTHER Member Calls Michelle Malkin a WHORE on NATIONAL TV … Then She ROASTS HIM [VIDEO]

BAISH The Left is 100% right (for once) when they complain that there is a racial divide in America… the problem with their complaint? They caused this divide, and they did it on purpose in order to turn Democrats into blood-thirsty Conservative-hating extremists. With groups like the Black Panthers and the infamous “Black Lives Matter” movement America is being torn at the seams. Leaders of these groups have proved that they have zero respect for anyone who disagrees with their mindset.

A golden example of these Liberal discriminatory groups is a case that happened back in 2007. Fox News’s Michelle Malkin was interviewing Black Panthers leader Malik Shabazz around the time that the Duke Lacrosse case was going on. During this case, numerous white team players were accused of raping a young black woman. The boys were all found not guilty after facts came out that proved the case to have been fabricated. Shabazz openly attacked the white males, INSISTING that they young men committed the horrific rape, and claiming that they did it because of the young woman’s race. The conversation between Malkin and Shabazz got pretty heated when Shabazz had the kahunas to call Malkin a “political prostitute.” The clip below shows the infuriating interview.



Malkin held her composure through Shabazz’s inconsiderate and childish name-calling, but she didn’t just sit back and take it. Malkin went on to get Shabazz right where it hurts when she interrogated him about his current relationship with the boys’ accuser, Crystal Gail Mangum, after it was proven that she had made the entire rape up.

Another obvious example of the Left using race to stir up a violent war within our country is the newest race-based “movement,” none other than the “Black Lives Matter” effort. This violent group is guilty of openly displaying anti-white beliefs while claiming to fight for equal rights for blacks. What they are really fighting for is the chance to turn white people into second class citizens.

When Alton Sterling was killed by police in Baton Rouge, Louisiana and Philando Castile was killed by police in Falcon Heights, Minnesota, the Black Lives Matter rallies started popping up all over America. They cried police brutality, claiming that the police were specifically out to harm people of color around the country. They insisted that their group promoted racial equality. The problem with their sentiment? When they said “Black Lives Matter” they really meant ONLY black lives matter. They became infuriated when anyone mentioned the statement that “all lives matter.” They claimed that by saying “all lives matter” Americans were stuck in a mindset which put whites above blacks… but their argument made zero sense, because when blacks were killing other blacks in the street, they were silent.

And on top of a completely idiotic argument, the BLM movement took extremely drastic (and illegal) steps to prove that they would go to any lengths to instill fear in police all over our country and prove their dominance. Their rallies quickly turned into mobs, with BLM supporters causing serious vandalism to business and private properties. And even worse, the rallies began to come with a death toll.

One BLM protest that was held in Dallas, Texas started out fairly peacefully, but ended in a bloodbath when a gunman who had a personal hatred towards white police officers killed five and injured multiple other on-duty officers. Dan Patrick, Texas Lieutenant Gov., stated, “I do blame people on social media, with their hatred toward police. I do blame former Black Lives Matter protests- last night was peaceful, but others have not been… this has to stop.”

The violent protests from groups like BLM and the hateful speech against anyone with differing mindsets from groups like the Black Panthers has got to stop, and soon. When our officers are being killed in the streets and our talk show hosts are being verbally harassed, it should be clear that our country is in dire need of social changes. These racist groups have to be stopped.

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’