Chelsea Clinton Caught Stealing Money from Charity Foundation

KIRSTERS BAISH| After all of the shit the Clinton family has pulled over the years it shouldn’t come as a shock to hear that Chelsea Clinton has indeed stolen money from charity. In his upcoming book (due to be published in August), “Partners in Crime”, Jerome Corsi wrote about the Clinton Foundation, calling it a “vast, criminal conspiracy” and “a slush fund for grifters”. Corsi’s book explains that funds donated to aid India and Haiti’s earthquake victims mostly went towards lining the pockets of the Clinton family. Corsi hit the nail on the head.

The latest news involving the corrupt Clinton family is pretty low, even for the Clintons. It turns out that the charity money that the family embezzled from the earthquake victims is just the beginning. It is believed that schemes put into play by the former First Family has aided them in gaining hundreds of millions of dollars. $2 billion went right into the Clinton Foundation, which Corsi describes as “a philanthropic foundation the Clintons appear to use as a personal piggy bank.” $1 billon of the stolen money went towards Killary’s run in the 2016 presidential election.

Bill Clinton’s sexual misbehaviors cost the family some money, but they were able to pay their way out of any trouble thanks to generous donors. (Too bad no one knew what their money was really going towards.) Back in 2001, Bill Clinton was forced to pay the Arkansas Bar Association $25,000 for lying under oath when he stated that he did not have sex with Monica Lewinsky. Three years prior to the whole Monica Lewinsky scandal, Bill was forced to pay Paula Jones $850,000 in order to keep her mouth shut about his sexual harassment towards her. Their legal bills in the Monica Lewinsky scandal? Roughly $10.6 million. Even after claiming that they were literally drained of money in 2001, the family left the White House with $360,000 in furnishings.


KIRSTERS BAISH| After all of the shit the Clinton family has pulled over the years it shouldn’t come as a shock to hear that Chelsea Clinton has indeed stolen money from charity. In his upcoming book (due to be published in August), “Partners in Crime”, Jerome Corsi wrote about the Clinton Foundation, calling it a “vast, criminal conspiracy” and “a slush fund for grifters”. Corsi’s book explains that funds donated to aid India and Haiti’s earthquake victims mostly went towards lining the pockets of the Clinton family. Corsi hit the nail on the head.

The latest news involving the corrupt Clinton family is pretty low, even for the Clintons. It turns out that the charity money that the family embezzled from the earthquake victims is just the beginning. It is believed that schemes put into play by the former First Family has aided them in gaining hundreds of millions of dollars. $2 billion went right into the Clinton Foundation, which Corsi describes as “a philanthropic foundation the Clintons appear to use as a personal piggy bank.” $1 billon of the stolen money went towards Killary’s run in the 2016 presidential election.

Bill Clinton’s sexual misbehaviors cost the family some money, but they were able to pay their way out of any trouble thanks to generous donors. (Too bad no one knew what their money was really going towards.) Back in 2001, Bill Clinton was forced to pay the Arkansas Bar Association $25,000 for lying under oath when he stated that he did not have sex with Monica Lewinsky. Three years prior to the whole Monica Lewinsky scandal, Bill was forced to pay Paula Jones $850,000 in order to keep her mouth shut about his sexual harassment towards her. Their legal bills in the Monica Lewinsky scandal? Roughly $10.6 million. Even after claiming that they were literally drained of money in 2001, the family left the White House with $360,000 in furnishings.

Family friend of the Clintons, Rajat Gupta (AIF members) had given Chelsea a six-figure consulting job when she was fresh out of college with exactly zero experience. This was all right before Gupta was sentenced to a two-year stint in prison after being convicted of insider trading. Another friend of Clinton, Vinod Gupta, reportedly took $9.5 million in company funds to fund his own personal wants.

Unfortunately for the American people, it doesn’t end there. It has been reported that Chelsea Clinton has been using money from the Clinton Foundation to support her lavish lifestyle. She has been vacationing at the exclusive Amanyara Resort on Providenciales Island in Turks and Caicos, which doesn’t come cheap. This is one of the world’s most pricy places to vacation, with rooms costing $34,000 in their busy season, which is more than the average American citizen makes in a whole year.

Chelsea’s husband, Marc Mezvinsky, was brought into the Clinton Foundation as a hedge fund manager. Hillary aided him in scoring a meeting with the State Department. You’ll never guess what means she used to set up the meeting. The email was sent on her private server in her Westchester home.

Isn’t it great to think that lying and stealing can earn you extravagant vacations and $12,000 Armani jackets? Even though it comes as no surprise that this is the type of shit the Clintons are pulling, it still boggles my mind that there are still people who support this sick and twisted family. I mean really, stealing money from charity? How low can you get?

Family friend of the Clintons, Rajat Gupta (AIF members) had given Chelsea a six-figure consulting job when she was fresh out of college with exactly zero experience. This was all right before Gupta was sentenced to a two-year stint in prison after being convicted of insider trading. Another friend of Clinton, Vinod Gupta, reportedly took $9.5 million in company funds to fund his own personal wants.

Unfortunately for the American people, it doesn’t end there. It has been reported that Chelsea Clinton has been using money from the Clinton Foundation to support her lavish lifestyle. She has been vacationing at the exclusive Amanyara Resort on Providenciales Island in Turks and Caicos, which doesn’t come cheap. This is one of the world’s most pricy places to vacation, with rooms costing $34,000 in their busy season, which is more than the average American citizen makes in a whole year.

Chelsea’s husband, Marc Mezvinsky, was brought into the Clinton Foundation as a hedge fund manager. Hillary aided him in scoring a meeting with the State Department. You’ll never guess what means she used to set up the meeting. The email was sent on her private server in her Westchester home.

Isn’t it great to think that lying and stealing can earn you extravagant vacations and $12,000 Armani jackets? Even though it comes as no surprise that this is the type of shit the Clintons are pulling, it still boggles my mind that there are still people who support this sick and twisted family. I mean really, stealing money from charity? How low can you get?

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’