A very sad reality in the world today is that the European continent has been infested by cancerous left-wing ideology.

Most of the prominent nations have been thoroughly taken over by leftists intent on transforming their respective societies into progressive utopias.

But all they’ve managed to do is drastically diminish everything that made these nations great.

They’ve eroded freedom of speech and decided to show favor to those who aren’t citizens or part of the native ethnic group.

The worst part of all this is that these traitorous politicians have invited in hordes of invaders that have occupied their lands and have no intention of assimilating to Western culture.

Millions of Muslims have been given special treatment and elevated above all others, which has resulted in mayhem.

Crime in these countries has spiked due to the violence these mostly young Muslim men brought with them from the Middle East.

To make matters worse, the leftist courts and local governments refuse to acknowledge everyday reality for fear of being punished by strict speech laws or their own ignorant acceptance of it.

As reported at Mad World News, there are a ton of examples, but an especially appalling one comes from the failing nation of Sweden.

Since they’ve become the self-proclaimed “first feminist government,” the nation has seen a rash of crime increases, especially violence against women.

The open-minded Swedes are so tolerant, that they’re letting a 16-year-old Muslim that raped a 13-year-old girl and filmed it, off with just 40 hours of “youth service.”

Adding insult to injury, he and his parents are now challenging the judgment of the Court of Appeal for being too harsh.

Ali was convicted in February of child rape after he pinned a 13-year old girl against a wall at Toleredsskolan in Gothenburg and forced her to perform oral sex.

The crime took place in July, 2016.

This ruling is enraging, and Swedes that aren’t morons should be up in arms about it.

Unfortunately, the resistance to such madness is depressingly weak.

In the UK, similar things have happened.

A 20-year-old Muslim man recently raped a 10-year-old boy at a swimming pool, but ultimately got his conviction overturned because he claimed that he “didn’t know the boy didn’t want it,” and also because it was a “sexual emergency.”

Only Muslims are allowed to get away with such shocking crimes, as they get to feign ignorance and claim they’re culturally different, which obviously shouldn’t matter.

This is the kind of insanity that comes from leftist ideology.

It’s pure cancer and must be eradicated from the face of the earth.

There is no place for such irrational and unnatural thinking.

We are in a major war against these poisonous ideas, and we must vigilantly stand against them until they are defeated. Source: Mad World News

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’