MEDIA SILENT As TRUMP RECORDS ANOTHER YUUUUUGE WIN For The AMERICAN PEOPLE! [VIDEO]

THE ELITE AND THEIR BOUGHT AND PAID FOR MINIONS IN THE MEDIA WILL DO ANYTHING TO AVOID COVERING ANYTHING THAT EVEN REMOTELY RESEMBLES A WIN FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP.  TOO BAD FOR THEM, ALL TRUMP DOES IT WIN, AND TODAY HE SCORED ANOTHER HUGE, HUGE WIN …
ALLEN WEST
– Following President Donald Trump’s election victory, it seemed that every other day he’d emerge from a meeting with a business leader to announce they’d be investing billions in the US economy, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs combined.

Among the companies promising new jobs (thanks to Trump specifically) include Alibaba, Softbank, General Motors, Samsung, LG Electronics, Foxxconn, Hyundai, Toyota, among others. As you may have noticed, there are a lot of foreign companies on that list, presumably enticed by the tax and regulatory reform Trump has promised for a healthier business environment.

The latest firm we can add to the list is Charter Communications, the $100 billion cable telecommunications behemoth, who Trump just announced today has committed to investing $25 billion in the US economy, and hiring 20,000 workers over four years.  Charter also pledged to close all their offshore call centers and move them into the US at a White House meeting their CEO had with the president. Thus far there’s a plan to open a call center in McAllen, Texas, which will employ 600 people by the end of 2018.

It’s also worth noting that much of that $25 billion in spending will indirectly create jobs (for example, business-to-business spending will help the businesses they’re making purchases from employ more people).

As Trump noted, Charter is one of the fastest growing firms in their space, and that shows. Since just 2010, their company’s stock has increased nearly nine times that of the S&P.

And that’s a trend that’ll probably continue, given Trump’s plan to revitalize American infrastructure was also a topic of discussion at his meeting with Charter. A couple Republican lawmakers on the House subcommittee on Communications and Technology said they’re confident broadband will be part of Trump’s infrastructure package, and Democrats have even said they’d support such inclusion.

Note that some of these changes were going to occur anyway, such as the 20,000 jobs created, and the call center in Texas, however, the $25 billion in pledged investment and closing of all offshore call centers is new.

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’