KIRSTERS BAISH| A Muslim immigrant living in Ohio, Jamal Mansour, murdered his 27-year-old daughter, Tahani, in cold blood this past September when he shot her three times in the head as she slept. Mansour pleaded not guilty to the charge. You won’t believe his sick reasoning for killing his own child.

The murder was clearly committed execution style, as each one of the shots was taken from close range, and distributed very meticulously. In court, Mansour asserted that the murder was accidental. He claims that he accidentally shot his own daughter three times in the head. Mansour claims that he wasn’t aware that the gun was loaded… which doesn’t help his case at all. Why would he be pointing a gun at his sleeping daughter’s head at all? And once he had already shot her why would he continue to shoot?

Mansour’s family gave a laughable excuse for his actions, claiming that he suffered from diabetes. Tons of people suffer from diabetes and we can say with certainty that diabetes doesn’t cause people to randomly act violent and commit murder.

“We had the fire department respond and do an evaluation, it turns out [the father] was not under any medical care at the time of the incident and since he’s been in our jail,” Lieutenant Lichman of Rocky River police said.

Authorities saw through Mansour’s weak defense and continued searching for evidence proving that he was guilty. New evidence has surfaced that proves Mansour did in fact know that the gun was loaded when he aimed it at his daughter’s head and pulled the trigger. He was caught on camera at a convenience store loading the gun just a few days prior to the murder. The camera doesn’t lie. And considering Mansour’s Muslim background he certainly had motive. Mansour’s respect for Sharia Law was a huge part of why he killed his daughter.

Right before killing Tahani, Mansour and Tahani had gotten into a fight regarding her traveling to Las Vegas on a business trip. Mansour had not wanted his daughter to go and strongly urged her to stay home. Prosecution labeled the murder as an “honor killing.” The liberal politically correct defense lawyer jumped at the chance to accuse the prosecution team of being racist.

Author of the book “Honor Killing: A Professional’s Guide to Sexual Relations and Ghayra Violence from the Islamic Sources” explained, “Mr. Mansour might have assimilated to Western culture sufficiently to shave his beard and wear jeans but not to accept his daughter behaving like Western girls.”

Liberals want to claim that Muslims are wonderful people and we should be opening our borders for them to swarm our country in masses. This is ridiculous and anyone who supports open borders should seriously rethink their viewpoints. We have got to stop allowing a group of people riddled with such hate to continue to spread throughout our great nation, or our nation will continue to rapidly decline.

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’