After Poll Exposes DEMOCRATS LIES … America Demands THIS NEW LAW
KIRSTERS BAISH| It always seems that the only group making real changes is the Republican Party. In recent months, Republican lawmakers have been working on a bill that could change the way America deals with illegal aliens. They have been working on pushing a bill through Congress that if enacted would create and enforce much tougher penalties for returning illegal aliens who have already been deported once. A new poll shows damning evidence that the American people are in adamant support of the bill. This could be a game changer for the United States of America. With our growing population of criminals and miscreants it’s time that we look to the source of the problem. Now, I’m not saying that all immigrants are criminals by any means, but statistics have proven that with the influx of illegal aliens in the United States our crime rate has significantly grown.
The bill, Kate’s Law, was passed by the House of Representatives on June 29th. The problem is that Senate Democrats have made threats to do anything they possibly can to get in the way of the bill’s final approval. Their argument was that the American citizens didn’t agree with it. Well, they were sadly mistaken.
The results of a brand-new Rasmussen poll prove that the Senate Democrats are just talking out of their asses. Their assumptions about what the American people “want” couldn’t be more wrong. The poll found that 63 percent of Americans are indeed in favor of increased criminal penalties for repeat offenders of illegal immigration to the United States. (If we kicked them out once you would think that they would get the idea that we didn’t want them here…)
The Senate Democrats couldn’t have been more wrong. The percentage of Americans who opposed the law was a measly 26 percent. 12 percent of people polled were undecided.
The bill in question was named in honor of Kate Steinle. She was only 32 years old when she was murdered in July of 2015 by an illegal immigrant who had SEVEN felony convictions. He had already been deported from the U.S five times prior to her murder. These are the types of people we are allowing into our country over and over again, simply because liberals don’t want to exclude anyone. The problem is that by allowing such lax laws and regulations on immigration we are putting the lives of all American citizens at risk, much like Kate.
Kate’s murder happened in San Francisco, which was dubbed a “sanctuary city”. These cities do not notify United States Immigrations and Customs Enforcement before the release of detained undocumented immigrants.
If everything goes according to plan, the law would allow criminal justice officials the opportunity to press all kinds of charges against these illegal aliens. It will also allow them to enforce and implement longer jail sentences. The hope is that by making repeat illegal immigration offenses a more serious matter, we will be able to keep criminals off the streets reported The Daily Caller.
So far, the bill has made it through the House with 233 GOP votes and 24 Democrat votes. It is now on its way to the Senate, where most likely it will not be passed without a valiant fight. In July of 2016, a similar bill did not obtain the 60 votes needed to pass it. We are hoping this time this new bill will pass.
If the current bill is blocked, Senate Democrats will be putting more American lives at risk. We have already lost too many of our innocent citizens to the violence of illegal aliens. It’s time to take back our country and make America safe again.
HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP
“Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance.
Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.”
Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump.
Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon.
“Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.”
Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday.
The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.”
But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why?
At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime.
“The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained:
For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code.
However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct.
A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.”
However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him.
. Obama’s Iran nuke deal
Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server
Obama IRS targets conservatives
Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters
Obamacare & Obama’s false promises
Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order
Operation Fast & Furious
5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl
‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session
Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval
Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law
Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act
Illegally conducting war against Libya
NSA: Spying on Americans
Muslim Brotherhood ties
Solyndra and the lost $535 million
Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress
Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers
Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’