ROMNEY WORDSWORTH – As originally reported in Psychology Today, between 31% to 57% of women surveyed from 1973 to 2008, (about 4 in 10 women) admitted to having secret rape fantasies, with a median frequency of once per month.  Many women reported feelings of being abnormal or perverted for having these fantasies, indicating the real figure is probably significantly higher, but goes unreported.

The Journal of Sex Research reported a study conducted in 2009 by psychologists at North Texas University.   355 college women were asked: How often have you fantasized being overpowered/forced/raped by a man/woman to have oral/vaginal/anal sex against your will?

An astounding 62% of the women surveyed reported having had at least one such fantasy.  Responses varied depending on how the question was phrased. When women were asked if they fantasized about being “overpowered by a man,” 52 percent said they’d had that fantasy.  This also is the most popular scenario typically depicted in women’s romance fiction. But when the question was asked using the word “rape,” 32 percent said they’d had the fantasy, which is still a surprisingly high number.

The survey data corresponds to anecdotal information, such as the widespread popularity of Fifty Shades of Grey, a novel and movie about romanticized sadomasochism.

Is this the result of the “pornification of America”?  As the popular culture becomes more and more sexualized, in ever more crude and explicit terms, is this changing the way women think about sex?  Or does it have nothing to do with pop culture?  Is it a deep seated psychological craving of women that harkens back to human existence in a State of Nature, where women survived by virtue of pairing off with the most aggressive alpha males, who were also the most successful hunters?

According to, rape is the third highest reported female sexual fantasy: 

“These female sex fantasies usually involve a gorgeous man carrying her off to his bedroom and quickly getting down to business. She’ll protest as he tears her clothing off and expertly arouses her body, but on the inside, she’ll love every minute of it. This continues to the point of penetration, and leads her to an incredible orgasm despite her earlier protests.”

Of course, one might point out that this isn’t really rape, because there is an underlying willingness of the woman in these scenarios to participate in sex.  One can well imagine that if we slightly tweaked the scenario, say, by replacing the “gorgeous man” with a short, fat, balding man with a big zit on the side of his nose, that the female reaction would be something less than enthusiastic.

How do we reconcile this data with the Radical Feminist movement’s constant railing against “the rape culture”?  As Shakespeare would say:  Doth thou protest too much?  Does this explain why significant numbers of Western women have travelled to the Middle East to join ISIS, which actually does have a very real, legally codified, rape culture?  Is this just the most extreme example of the more common penchant for women to be attracted to “bad boys”?

Anecdotally, I once dated a medical student who admitted to secretly wanting to be “thrown up against a wall” and taken forcefully.  So as far as I’m concerned, this is a real phenomenon, albeit one that does NOT apply to all women.  It would also explain the vast confusion between the sexes as to what women expect from men.  Men, being the simple minded creatures that we are, simply can’t deal well with getting constant mixed signals.

Rather than continue the current popular legal and cultural climate to demonize and criminalize male sexuality, perhaps both women and men would be much happier being able to just be themselves.

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’