U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at the USS Wisconsin battleship in Norfolk, Virginia October 31, 2015. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

ROMNEY WORDSWORTH – Today is Wednesday, November 4, 2015, and that means it’s Trumpday.  Let’s look at the state of the race.

CNBC did such an unprecedented hatchet job on the Republican Presidential candidates during their last debate, they may have succeeded in ruining the racket that the Liberal Media had been running on the Republican Party, permanently.  Perennial milquetoast Reince Preibus finally was forced to dump NBC or face a party wide revolt.  Donald Trump has used this vacancy to hold a meeting of the major Republican campaigns (which excluded the RNC from attendance) in Virginia this week.  The result of that meeting is that the campaigns (read:  Donald Trump) are now going to directly negotiate with the networks to find new moderators for the February 26, 2016 debate that NBC lost.

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at the USS Wisconsin battleship in Norfolk, Virginia October 31, 2015.      REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at the USS Wisconsin battleship in Norfolk, Virginia October 31, 2015. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

The word on the street is that the February date is going to be turned into the first Conservative Talk Radio presidential debate, moderated by Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Mark Levin.  Finally a primary debate hosted by conservatives that showcases conservatism.

Trump’s demonstration of leadership and skill in negotiating is paying out real world dividends.  According to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll of Republicans conducted after the CNBC moderated third presidential debate, Donald Trump is, by a wide margin, the Republican candidate most trusted to manage the economy, deal with foreign leaders and serve as commander in chief. 

More Republicans would trust him with the nation’s nuclear weapons than most of the rest of their party’s presidential primary field.  This is significant, because one of the Democrat main lines of attack on Trump, just as it was against Ronald Reagan, was the charge that Trump was too much of an erratic hot head to have his finger on the nuclear button.  Another failure for the Palace Guard Media.

In other quarters, Jeb Bush is trying to reinvent and reintroduce himself to the voters, for the 5th time, as the candidate who can “fix America”.  I don’t know that Jeb Bush is any more plausible as America’s political “handyman” as he was as the Republican “real outsider” to the Washington Establishment (LAUGHTER).

What Jeb Bush is really turning into is the Dr. Evil style Villain who, when his plans to take over the world fails, reverts to form by taking hostages.  In the case of Jeb Bush, the 102 page campaign plan that was leaked this week shows that he plans to use his $100 million war chest to hold the Republican candidates hostage, with the threat that if Jeb isn’t the nominee, he’ll use his $100 million to run TV ads to destroy all the other candidates.  Jeb Bush claims to have “no knowledge” of this plan.  Then again, Jeb also pledged to “support” the party’s nominee.  And Dr. Evil has a high energy weapon he calls a “laser beam”.  Stay tuned for further news while Jeb Bush stands out on the “ledge” of a “tall building” with his thumb on the “dead man switch”. 


In the fevered swamps of Fascism, where the Democrat Party now dwells, Hillary Clinton has become the candidate that is “Too Big to Jail”.  For the first time in American history, we have a presidential candidate, Mrs. Bill Clinton, openly running on a platform that promises to confiscate American’s guns, with or without amending the 2nd Amendment.  Because after all, to the communists of the Democrat Party, at this point, what difference does it make what the Constitution says?  Hillary’s campaign promises to confiscate all the guns in America (approx. 350 million) in the same manner as was done in Australia.  That this would almost guarantee a violent, shooting, Civil War in America is so obvious, even the Daily Beast is getting creeped out by Hillary.

In a wonderfully ironic definition of the term “gaslighting”, the Democrat Establishment still insists that those who are warning of the Democrat plan to confiscate guns are just “conspiracy theorists”.

If America’s choice in 2016 is between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, the choice will be the starkest contrast in our history.

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’